Let me start off by telling a short story. I’ve been trying to find a copy of this play for the longest time, and I finally found one, last night, at the borders downtown. Being the studious student that I sometimes am, I decided, at 930 in the evening, to go on an adventure from the woes of park merced to downtown–a journey that girls like me seldom take by themselves. But hey, I’m glad I did it because it was one of the more interesting plays that I’ve read, The Crucible included. Ok, enough about me.
Loyalty plays a major roll in the downfall of eddie, catherine, B, rodolfo, and marco. Different takes on the loyalty between people ultimately causes conflict. for example, eddie feels a loyalty, maybe even an obligation, to catherine’s parents and to catherine herself to, in a way, “protect” her. it’s obvious that catherine is past that protection phase of her life and has to go out and experience new things for herself, but eddie can’t feel the same way–the tragic conflict of overbearing parents (parents being used very loosely). eddie’s loyalty to catherine can be misinterpreted as overprotectiveness (wait, doesn’t he kiss her at the end? that was weird) and doesn’t let rodolfo into catherine’s life the way catherine wants rodolfo in her life, and therefore he reacts the way he does to the whole situation because he can’t get over his “loyalty” to catherine.
I guess during that time, loyalty meant a lot to blue-collared workers because, what else had they? At least in the context of the story, every character had to be loyal to the other one if their housing of the illegal immigrants would work. eddie, b, and catherine all had a loyalty to rodolfo and marco to not get the caught. eddie, in the end, broke that loyalty and called up immigration, which caused this whole spiral into disaster and his eventual death. marco and rodolfo had loyalty towards their hosts because of the amount of legal trouble they could conjure up if they ever got caught. but once that loyalty was broken with eddie ratting them out, marco spat in his face, the ultimate “IT’S OVER” non-verbal signal.
This type of test towards one’s loyalty is, at least in my perspective, way intense. I’ve never been so tested in my loyalty to someone else in any aspect. the only thing i can think of that was remotely close to testing my loyalty was when i was at a party with my high school friends, and, lo and behold, the girl that caused all the drama our senior year walked in and shot my [drunk] best friend a dirty look. my best friend then proceeded to tell me that if it was going to go down, i had to come in swinging. I thought, “man, i’d fight, but i’d only fight for myself” but this was my best friend we’re talking about, a part of, a reflection of myself, which is in a way how eddie viewed catherine. eddie wanted catherine to see past rodolfo’s advances and see his “true” motives–true as a subjective idea. of course i’d throw down with my best friend THANK GOD IT DIDN’T HAVE TO.

